HERBERT A. ROSS
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge
_______________________________x | |
In re Case No. 5-84-00009-HAR | |
In Chapter 7 | |
RAYMOND L. OLSEN and GLADYS M. | |
Debtor(s) | |
_______________________________x | |
FIRST BANK, on its own behalf | |
Plaintiff(s), | |
v. | Adv. No. 5-84-00009-001-HAR |
| |
RAYMOND L. OLSEN and GLADYS M. OLSEN and GORDON ZERBETZ, | |
Defendant(s). | |
v. | |
JAMES M. DODSON, JR. and STATE | |
FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, | ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEY |
Third-Party | FEES AS ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
Defendants. | AGAINST THE ESTATE BY FIRST BANK |
________________________________x |
First Bank filed a motion on March 27, 1991 (Docket No.
77) asking for attorney fees in this case to be awarded as
administrative expenses against the estate. First Bank filed this
adversary proceeding as a stakeholder of funds that were on deposit
in its bank which were claimed by the chapter 7 trustee to be
estate funds and by the debtors to be debtors' individual funds.
Debtors filed a counterclaim against First Bank alleging many kinds
1 ABR 511
of malfeasance. Summary judgment was entered in favor of First
Bank against the debtors under Rule 54(b).
The trustee has opposed charging these fees as an administrative expense of the estate. It may be that a nominal attorney fees and costs award to First Bank out of the funds interpleaded would be justified for its filing this stakeholder's action. Cf. In re Northeast Dairy Co-op. Fed., Inc., 72 B.R. 663, 686 (Bankr.N.D.N.Y. 1987) and In re Jones, 61 B.R. 48, 53-54 (Bankr.N.D.Tex. 1986) (which denied the fees because the interpleading plaintiff was a bank), cited by First Bank. However, the vast majority of the litigation which First Bank has been involved with in this adversary proceeding is as a result of the counterclaim by debtors against First Bank. The estate should not have to pay for this.
Secondly, I cannot find in the motion itself or in the memorandum (except by tedious reference to the billing statement attached to the moving papers which include some poor copies and summaries which I have difficulty following) a precise figure that is being claimed for attorney fees or an allocation of attorney fees amongst the various aspects of the case. Cf. In re Puget Sound Plywood, Inc., 924 F.2d 955, 960-61 (9th Cir. 1991)
Thirdly, this matter has only been noticed up to a
limited group of parties and not the matrix of creditors in the
main case as required by Bankruptcy Rule 2002(a)(7) since First
Bank is not only asking to be reimbursed from the funds it
1 ABR 512
interpled, but apparently as an administrative claimant to be paid
out of other estate proceeds. Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for attorney fees to be designated as administrative expense is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to First Bank filing a motion allocating attorney fees and costs to the various facets of the adversary proceeding and against the proper parties. Also, the motion must be served on all interested parties.
DATED: May 2, 1991.
HERBERT A. ROSS
Bankruptcy Judge
Serve:
Joseph Moran, Esq., Attorney for
Bernd Guetschow, Esq., for Zerbetz
Greg Motyka, Esq., for State Farm
James Dodson,
Raymond and Gladys Olsen, Pro Se, s
U.S. Trustee